Lamb, M. Elizabeth., & Gilbride, K. During the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and you will incompatible relationships (pp. 33-60). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Backlinks ]

Observed similarity and you will matchmaking profits among relationships couples: An idiographic means

Lee, L., Loewenstein, Grams., Ariely, D., Hong, J., & Young, J. (2008). If the I am not saying hot, will you be hot or perhaps not?: Physical-appeal product reviews and you will matchmaking choices while the a function of an individual’s very https://lovingwomen.org/sv/colombiansk-brud/ own elegance. Emotional Science, 19, 669677. [ Links ]

Levinger, Grams., & Rands, M. (1985)patibility in marriage or any other close matchmaking. Inside W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you may in conflict matchmaking (pp. 309-331). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Backlinks ]

Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. (1944). Amount of aspiration. For the J. McV. Appear (Ed.), Identity therefore the decisions issues (Vol. step 1, pp. 333378). Nyc: Ronald Force. [ Backlinks ]

Enjoying, T. J. (2006). Predicting relationship dating fate with insiders’ and you can outsiders’ perspective: Which and you can what’s requested matters. Private Relationship, 13, 349-362. [ Website links ]

Luo, S., & Klohnen, Age. C. (2005). Assortative mating and you will relationship high quality into the newly weds: A couple of dependent approach. Log of Identity and you will Public Mindset, 88, 304-326. [ Links ]

Madden, Yards., & Lenhart, A good. (2006). Matchmaking. Arizona, DC: Report for the Pew Internet sites & American Life Project. Recovered , regarding [ Website links ]

MacDonald, T. K., & Ross, Meters. (1999). Evaluating the accuracy out-of predictions regarding the relationship relationships: How and just why would lovers’ predictions differ from the individuals made by perceiver? Identification and you can Public Mindset Bulletin, 25, 14171429. [ Hyperlinks ]

ater, J., & Smith, S. (1982). Legitimizing situations regarding the initiation from heterosexual matchmaking. Report demonstrated on Very first In the world Conference into Individual Matchmaking, Madison, WI. [ Hyperlinks ]

Merkle, E.R., & Richardson, Roentgen.A good. (2000). Digital relationship and you will digital appropriate: Conceptualizing desktop mediated intimate relationships. Household members, forty two, 187-192. [ Website links ]

Montoya, Roentgen. Meters., Horton, R. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Is actually actual similarity essential destination? A great meta-studies off genuine and you can seen similarity. Journal of Public and private Relationship, twenty five, 889-922. [ Backlinks ]

Morry, M. Meters. (2005). Dating fulfillment because the good predictor from similarity reviews; An examination of your own appeal-similarity hypothesis. Diary out of Societal and private Dating, twenty-two, 561-584. [ Hyperlinks ]

Journal off Public and personal Matchmaking, 23, 865-880

Morry, Meters. Yards. (2007). This new attraction-resemblance theory among cross-sex relatives: Dating pleasure, observed similarities, and you will care about-helping thinking. Log out of Public and private Relationships, 24, 117-138. [ Website links ]

Murstein, B. I. (1987). A clarification and extension of your own SVR theory of dyadic combining. Log regarding ily, 49, 929-947. [ Hyperlinks ]

Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J. Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). Who’ll splitting up: A good fourteen-year longitudinal study of black colored lovers and you can white lovers. Diary out-of Public and private Relationship, 19, 179-202. [ Website links ]

Orenstein, S. (). This new like algorithm Suits believes it’s got discovered an algorithm to possess governing the web based dating team: A scientific strategy to find Mr. or Ms. Best. Business 2.0 Journal. Recovered towards the regarding [ Website links ]

Rammstedt, B., & Schupp, J. (2008). Precisely the congruent endure — Identity parallels in partners. Identity and you will Private Distinctions, 45, 533-535. [ Links ]

Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, S., & Cate, R. (2000). Lover choice: Just what functions carry out anyone attract within quick-term sexual and you may a lot of time-name intimate partners? Diary regarding Psychology and you may Peoples Sexuality, a dozen, 1-21. [ Backlinks ]

Reis, H. T. (1985). The role of one’s thinking about initiation and course of social communication. During the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and incompatible relationships (pp. 209-231). Nyc: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Hyperlinks ]